世卫的文字原来是这样的： -jackliu8688(Jack) @拉斯维加斯华人论坛:拉斯维加斯枫下论坛 The Rolia Forum of Las Vegas

世卫的文字原来是这样的：

jackliu8688(Jack)

“Children should not be vaccinated for the moment.

There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults. However, children should continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines. ”

后来改成这样：

“Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.”

(#13801544@0)
Last Updated: 2021-6-23
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

世卫改口了（受到压力了？），对他们不推荐儿童打新冠疫苗的立场有所缓和，这是新的建议： “Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 {356} (#13800543@0)

so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.”

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines/advice

你终于知道要看原文而不是那些瞎编的网站了， WHO的立场一直没改变，都说了好久了要把疫苗给穷的国家而不是给儿童，也一直说12岁以上可以打辉瑞。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801507@0) +2

+1 -nazacalines(游戏); 2021-6-23 (#13800840@0) +2

式微组织终于听从了本坛网友的意见😄 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801086@0) +2

是本坛网友串改了WHO的原话，至于什么目的大家都知道. WHO明明说的是：1.青少年less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 {139} (#13801497@0) +1
those with chronic health conditions and health workers.; 2. Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above

你发帖串改WHO的原话是什么目的呢？人家原文是这样说的 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 {967} (#13801487@0) +3

Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.

More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.

WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) has concluded that the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and above. Children aged between 12 and 15 who are at high risk may be offered this vaccine alongside other priority groups for vaccination. Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy.

It's important for children to continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines.

所以他们不敢贴who的链接。 -curve(curve); 2021-6-23 (#13801513@0)

这些人净找些没credit的网站来忽悠，可他们忽悠了这么久的结果就是连我那些原来说不打疫苗的同事都积极地打完了第二针。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801521@0) +2
上面几位都看不出来，这又是一篇主瘤自扇嘴巴的例子：Vaccine trials for children are ongoing，More evidence is needed.... 对比the Pfizer/BionTech vaccine is suitable for use by people aged 12 years and .... -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801529@0) +1
lifesitenews的文章里不仅有世卫原来文字的截图，还有世卫的链接。没有什么藏着掖着。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 (#13801532@0) +2

你给找找WHO的guidance里哪有“Children should not be vaccinated for the moment”这句话。找不到的话说你们串改人家WHO原文不冤枉吧。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801541@0) +2

世卫在lifesitenews文章帖出后，对他们不推荐儿童打新冠疫苗的立场有所缓和，修改了文字。lifesitenews的文章里不仅有世卫原来文字的截图，还有世卫的链接；如果lifesitenews造谣，为什么敢把世卫的链接放在自己的文章里呢？ -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 (#13801528@0) +1

那你说说为啥lifesitenews上的文字和WHO的原文对不上，甚至意思都不同？原因很简单，就是绝大多数人都不会去WHO的网站看原文的，只看lifesitenews上的文字，而这个网站就利用很多人的这个缺点串改原文从而达到他们的目的。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801537@0) +2

用大白话翻译世卫言论：给孩子吃的药，正在实验中，如果1000个孩子吃了无一人死亡则通过，现在100个孩子吃了都没事，所以我们认为孩子可以吃了。。。。😄呵呵，是不是自扇嘴巴 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801543@0) +3
世卫的文字原来是这样的： -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 {834} (#13801544@0) +2
“Children should not be vaccinated for the moment.
There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults. However, children should continue to have the recommended childhood vaccines. ”
后来改成这样：
“Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults, so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.
More evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.”

怎么证明WHO修改前是你说的那样？给个官方的link -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801548@0)

有多个媒体报道世卫原来的文字，而且有截图。如果你要世卫的链接，那只有改过文字的链接，因为是同一个链接，只不过文字内容有修改。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 (#13801553@0) +2

你的意思就是说你没法证明WHO不建议儿童打疫苗，对吧？我建议你以后发帖前最好把文章里link的原文也看一遍，别被人忽悠也别忽悠其他人。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801562@0) +1

你不要创造我的意思啊。不管是原来还是现在的文字，世卫都不建议孩子打疫苗，只不过原来的文字更强烈一些。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 (#13801571@0) +3

WHO哪句话不建议青少年打疫苗了？拜托给出原文。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801582@0) +1

我建议你以后发帖前最好把文章里link的原文也看一遍，看看内容是否自扇嘴巴，别被人忽悠也别忽悠其他人。 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801573@0) +4

就是按照你给的世卫文字，它们也是在自扇嘴巴 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801555@0) +3

标题纯粹误导，建议斑竹改一下标题，或者删帖吧。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801564@0) +1

赞成，标题改为：世卫自扇嘴巴，承认疫苗儿童实验未完成时，儿童仍然能够安全注射疫苗 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801584@0) +3

其实说起来很寒心，很多权力机构都在作虚假宣传，宣称疫苗“安全”。问题是，这疫苗试验还在进行中，凭什么说它是安全的；还没有进行足够长时间的副作用的观察，凭什么说它是安全的。尤其是，为了鼓励孩子们去打，还对家长们作这种虚假宣传。 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-23 (#13801595@0) +4

也怪家长语文不好，只看到世卫推荐这一句，没明白Vaccine trials for children are ongoing，More evidence is needed...是啥意思 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801599@0) +3

你以为就你英语好？不是所有人，但大多数人都知道疫苗3期没完成，是正在进行时，FDA是紧急授权，不是正式批准。人家家长自有他们的考虑，你不用替人家操心了。 -househot(花开花落); 2021-6-23 (#13801603@0) +1

呵呵，也对，人家的娃，免费给疫苗厂当小白鼠，关我啥事😄 -hbz0(halfpercent); 2021-6-23 (#13801605@0) +5

一些权力机构， -jackliu8688(Jack); 2021-6-24 {377} (#13801742@0) +2
睁着眼睛说瞎话，把这个处于试验期的、没有被FDA批准的“疫苗”说成是安全的，还鼓励孩子们打。多伦多还用免费冰淇淋引诱孩子们打，还出台政策，不需要家长同意孩子就可以打。新冠病毒对于孩子们的威胁几乎为零，甚至低于流感，孩子们根本不需要打；而且这“疫苗”有一些重大隐患没有排除，例如可能导致不育。想想，一些孩子，可能为了一份免费的冰淇淋，就失去了这辈子生育的能力。这是现在正在发生的事。

@Las Vegas

世卫的文字原来是这样的：

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics