This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

Ad by

你那句翻譯有點跑歪,不過造句算順暢,Fox News 引用的那篇丹麥Statens Serum Institut的文章,文尾結論,不論是Delta 和 Omicron, 未接種疫苗的人的傳染能力,比接種疫苗或是booster的人都要強

youarenotfunnyatall(草山)

(#14241162@0)
Last Updated: 2022-1-4
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 病毒跑得快，全靠疫苗带。——专家们终于隐瞒不住了： -once01(一切都还没结束); 2022-1-3 {235} (#14241099@0) +8

Twitter Tweet

https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/1478218379370455043?s=21

The study, which examined 12,000 households, found that omicron is 2.7-3.7 times more infectious than delta among vaccinated individuals. -once01(一切都还没结束); 2022-1-3 (#14241110@0) +2

他们会说是病毒最好了得一遍就自然免疫了再说可以防重症和死亡呢不怕🤣脑子都被打得没有正常逻辑思维了 -nopush(nopush); 2022-1-4 (#14241240@0) +5
说白了，这个疫苗就是 O 病毒。要不无法解释南极考察站那 2/3 人员中的是哪来的毒 -once01(一切都还没结束); 2022-1-4 (#14241350@0) +6

疫苗对Omicron的预防效果没有对Delta好，并不是说疫苗让人多得病啊。 -rattledrum(小鼓); 2022-1-4 (#14241431@0) +1

那倒也不必。我只转我认为有一定可信度的消息。不想与人争论太厉害。我不是专家，他也未必是。 -once01(一切都还没结束); 2022-1-4 (#14241390@0)
强迫打的必须拉黑，还要设法把他关起来。 -firetrain(火车头); 2022-1-4 (#14241860@0)

疫苗VS流感，矛盾之争。 -neu_stone(stone); 2022-1-4 {732} (#14241157@0) +1

The rapid spread of omicron throughout the United States and the rest of the world is likely due to the COVID-19 variant's ability to evade immunity offered by vaccines, according to a Danish study released last week.

Full Story:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/omicrons-rapid-spread-is-likely-due-to-its-ability-to-evade-immunity-offered-by-vaccines-study-finds
你那句翻譯有點跑歪,不過造句算順暢,Fox News 引用的那篇丹麥Statens Serum Institut的文章,文尾結論,不論是Delta 和 Omicron, 未接種疫苗的人的傳染能力,比接種疫苗或是booster的人都要強 -youarenotfunnyatall(草山); 2022-1-4 {214} (#14241162@0) +11

:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.27.21268278v1.full.pdf

看O的傳播到底是哪個傳播能力強一目了然，接受事實吧，別再說皇帝的新裝好看了 -nopush(nopush); 2022-1-4 (#14241236@0) +11

关于病毒携带能力，难道不是50步笑百步么？这些50步的人到处浪、全世界散布病毒，难道还能义正言辞的说没法远行的百步者才是罪魁祸首？呵呵。 -lifyy(lifyy); 2022-1-4 (#14241375@0) +4

我的意见是建筑在该study可靠的情况下，普通百姓没有能力去鉴别、证明，只能在假设的情况下推断。但即使如此，也可以慢慢看出疫苗到底利多还是弊多。 -lifyy(lifyy); 2022-1-4 (#14242105@0) +2

Fox的新闻稿是这么写的，我摘几段： -micah(mica); 2022-1-4 {722} (#14241306@0) +2
1. Unvaccinated individuals were more likely to be infected by both variants and also had "higher transmissibility" in comparison to vaccinated individuals, but they were just as vulnerable to omicron as they were to delta.
2. Vaccine effectiveness was reduced to around 40% against symptoms and 80% against severe illness for omicron in the fully vaccinated. Booster shots increased those numbers to 86% and 98% respectively.
3. Booster-vaccinated individuals were not only well-protected against hospitalization, but they were also less likely to transmit the virus compared to individuals who had received two doses, according to the study. Unvaccinated people were most likely to transmit the virus.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/omicrons-rapid-spread-is-likely-due-to-its-ability-to-evade-immunity-offered-by-vaccines-study-finds

想打加强针直接上就行了，干嘛还要左顾右盼给自己找理由？不是都比喻成吃馒头吗？你难道吃个馒头也这么费思量？ -cocowen(coco); 2022-1-4 (#14241395@0) +4

So enjoy your booster1, booster2, bosster3….every three months😌get ten get one free🤣 -nopush(nopush); 2022-1-4 (#14241343@0) +13
实际的数据并不支撑这论断，感染率对比，加拿大早就过了1:6了 -utgfxval3(蛙); 2022-1-4 (#14242014@0) +2

自然染疫康復,先不論後遣症,抗體數月後降低或變種一來,不是一樣接著得病 -youarenotfunnyatall(草山); 2022-1-4 (#14242220@0)

是不是呀？为什么武汉幸存者都没有再得病？ -firetrain(火车头); 2022-1-4 {488} (#14242236@0)

8月15日，武汉玛雅海滩水上乐园举行水上电音派对，有3000名民众入场，期间民众没有佩戴口罩，并没有保持社交距离。

Full Story:
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-53823437
疫苗没有后遗症没有副作用？抗生素没有副作用？为什么西方那么小心翼翼的开抗生素，却让你三个月打一针疫苗？不怕mess up你的immune system？ -cocojj(安静下来); 2022-1-4 (#14242487@0) +6