This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

Ad by

推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

拉郎配?看看最后1篇文章的讨论部分,与疫苗没有半毛钱的关系

xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba)

Conclusion

In summary, the observation that, compared with other respiratory viruses, children have less severe symptoms when infected by SARS-CoV-2 is surprising and not yet understood. Furthermore, it is also uncertain why children with the usual risk factors for infections, such as immunosuppression, are not at high risk for severe COVID-19, while previously healthy children can on rare occasions become severely ill.110–113 222 Although there are several hypotheses for why children are less affected by COVID-19, with the notable exception of age-related changes in immune and endothelial/clotting function, most do not explain the observed age-gradient in COVID-19 with severity and mortality rising steeply after the age of 60 to 70 years. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying the age-related differences in the severity of COVID-19 will provide important insights and opportunities for the prevention and treatment of this novel infection.

(#14264826@0)
Last Updated: 2022-1-12
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

枫下家园 / 医药保健 / "Over 1,000 Studies Published in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals Say the Vaccines Are Dangerous" - Steve Kirsch -jackliu8688(Jack); 2022-1-12 {686} (#14264814@0) +4

But the CDC says the vaccines are safe and effective and there is nothing to worry about. Seriously?

Full Story:
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/over-1000-studies-published-peer-reviewed-medical-journals-say-vaccines-are-dange

拉郎配?看看最后1篇文章的讨论部分,与疫苗没有半毛钱的关系 -xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba); 2022-1-12 {1126} (#14264826@0) +1
Conclusion
In summary, the observation that, compared with other respiratory viruses, children have less severe symptoms when infected by SARS-CoV-2 is surprising and not yet understood. Furthermore, it is also uncertain why children with the usual risk factors for infections, such as immunosuppression, are not at high risk for severe COVID-19, while previously healthy children can on rare occasions become severely ill.110–113 222 Although there are several hypotheses for why children are less affected by COVID-19, with the notable exception of age-related changes in immune and endothelial/clotting function, most do not explain the observed age-gradient in COVID-19 with severity and mortality rising steeply after the age of 60 to 70 years. Unravelling the mechanisms underlying the age-related differences in the severity of COVID-19 will provide important insights and opportunities for the prevention and treatment of this novel infection.

你先把自己偷偷屯的兽药清空了再来 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2022-1-12 (#14264831@0) +6

怎么又露馅了? -xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba); 2022-1-12 (#14264841@0) +3

当然有关系。那个总结说，儿童即使感染也很少有严重的症状。那么自然就引出这个问题，给儿童打“疫苗”是不必要的。 -uws(United We Sell); 2022-1-12 (#14264849@0) +4

安省过去2-3周刚因新冠死了2个10岁以下的孩子，不要以为孩子没有事情。等有事情就来不及后悔了。 -coolrock(coolrock); 2022-1-12 (#14264856@0) +1

先不说你这个数字准不准确，谁知道这孩子的情况，现在得新冠的多了，正好阳性可能都算新冠死亡。全安省就两个就被吓成这样，车祸感冒癌症可能都比这个死的多吧。 -donmils(妈妈); 2022-1-12 (#14264891@0) +4
那两个孩子是不是有基础病？药水会让多少孩子健康受损、甚至丧失生命？心血管疾病、猝死、免疫系统紊乱、癌症、、、 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2022-1-12 (#14264892@0) +4
需要知道具体一些的情况。比如，这两个孩子打过“疫苗”了吗？真的是因为新冠去世的吗？主媒刚刚报道了一个旧闻：真正因为新冠死亡的人数，只占CDC公布人数的6%。 -uws(United We Sell); 2022-1-12 (#14264908@0) +2

真正死于流感的人多吗？大部分因为流感而死亡的人是因为流感引发的并发症，新冠也是同样的。没有新冠就没有并发症，所以目前的计算方法没有问题。 -coolrock(coolrock); 2022-1-12 (#14264929@0)

CDC的新冠死亡数字中，包含了“物理损伤”这一个原因，占几个百分点呢。physical injury. -uws(United We Sell); 2022-1-12 (#14264968@0) +1

不就是反疫苗人士的脑回路,啥病都与疫苗有关系 -xiaozuiba(xiaozuiba); 2022-1-12 (#14264916@0)

如果你仔细看看“疫苗”的副作用列表，还真的是。啥病都有可能是“疫苗”引起的。 -uws(United We Sell); 2022-1-12 (#14264926@0) +1

这“疫苗”对付病毒不行，对付人倒是挺厉害的 -jackliu8688(Jack); 2022-1-12 (#14264931@0) +8

@Las Vegas

拉郎配?看看最后1篇文章的讨论部分,与疫苗没有半毛钱的关系

Conclusion

Replies, comments and Discussions:

Conclusion

More Topics