×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

谢谢,请看柱状图解读;



Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 我爱我车 / 汽车碰撞是,被安全带固定的乘员为什么会受伤? 1. 加速度, 2. 物理挤压。两车相撞是产生的碰撞力是相同的, a = f /m , 质量越大,加速度越小,乘客受伤程度越小。车厢越大,结构刚性越好,乘员受挤压的程度越小。所以,开重车,开大车在碰撞时越有利。
    • 请先论证“被安全带固定的乘员为什么会受伤”是否属实。不要急着在沙滩上建高楼,谢谢
    • 提醒你一下:其实iihs有统计,现实中到达一定限度后,重车、大车死亡率其实更高,因为这些车容易在车祸中被撞翻
      • Are people less likely to be killed or injured in a bigger, heavier vehicle? IIHS says, YES!
        • How do a vehicle’s size and weight affect safety?
          本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛All other things being equal, occupants in a bigger, heavier vehicle are better protected than those in a smaller, lighter vehicle. Both size and weight affect the forces people inside a vehicle experience during a crash. The magnitude of those forces is directly related to the risk of injury.

          In the case of size, the longer distance from the front of the vehicle to the occupant compartment gives a bigger vehicle an advantage in frontal crashes, which account for half of passenger vehicle occupant deaths. The longer that distance, the bigger the crush zone, and the lower the forces on the occupants.

          Weight comes into play in a collision involving two vehicles. The bigger vehicle will push the lighter one backward during the impact. As a result, there will be less force on the occupants of the heavier vehicle and more on the people in the lighter vehicle. Heavier vehicles also fare better in some single-vehicle crashes because they are more likely to move, bend or deform objects they hit.

          IIHS demonstrated the role of size and weight in a series of crash tests in 2009 in which a microcar and two minicars were each crashed into a midsize car from the same manufacturer. The Smart Fortwo, Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris all had good ratings in the Institute’s moderate overlap frontal test, but all three performed poorly in the crashes with midsize cars. 1更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
          • 质量大,空间大的车的优势是显而易见的。小车碰到大车就只能认命了。
            • 唉,问题是,车祸不只是大车撞小车。从统计学的角度,大车车祸中翻滚造成的死亡远远超过其他死因。你到现在还在纠结车撞车,却忘了其他车祸也会死人
        • Do bigger vehicles pose a threat to occupants of smaller vehicles?
          本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛A lighter vehicle will always be at a disadvantage in a collision with a heavier vehicle. Beyond weight differences, SUVs and pickups historically have posed a danger to people in cars because their energy-absorbing structures didn’t line up with those of lower-profile vehicles. As a consequence of such incompatible designs, cars would often underride SUVs and pickups, resulting in more severe damage and a higher risk of injury and death. An analysis of crashes in 2000-01 involving 1997-99 model vehicles showed that SUVs and pickups were much more likely than cars or minivans of the same weight to be involved in crashes that killed occupants of other cars or minivans. 4


          This mismatch has faded as a problem in recent years, thanks to new designs of SUVs and pickups. The energy-absorbing structures of these vehicles are now lower so that they line up better with those of cars. The new designs came out of a voluntary agreement forged by automakers, the government and IIHS in 2003. A more recent study of 2008-09 crashes involving 2005-08 models showed that SUVs were no more likely than cars to be in crashes in which occupants of other cars died. 5 Pickups still killed people in other vehicles at a higher rate, but the difference was much smaller than it was previously.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
        • 谢谢你提供的网站链接。
          • 这里是iihs的数据,看看再下结论 (153, #9885500@0)
        • 什么都是相对的,这里是数据,咱们看看再下结论
          http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/vehicle-size-and-weight/fatalityfacts/passenger-vehicles


          • 谢谢,请看柱状图解读;


            • 显然,midsize seden的死亡率低于large seden,也低于very large pickup,你怎么解释?large suv死亡率远低于very large suv,你又怎么解释?
              • 你要看趋势,而不是看特例。这个图的数据来源有放大效应,有数据失真的可能。如果一台劳斯莱斯的89岁乘客在意外中死亡,劳斯莱斯的每百万注册车辆的死亡率非常高。
                • 唉,都不知道说啥好了。就拿最少的very large sedan,那都是30万辆的基数,你这个理由也太牵强了点
                  • 就图论图:死亡率最低的是:Large SUV, 死亡率最高的是Mini Cars。任何SUV的死亡率低于任何Car。 Pickup死亡率高于SUV,但也比MiniCar和Small Car低。由图可见: Mini Car和 Small Car死亡率最高,Large SUV和Midsize SUV 死亡率最低。结论?
                    • 就图论图:pickups small的死亡率最低,其次是pickups large,死亡率最高的是pickups very large。还有,midsize sedan死亡率低于large sedan!我这都是橘子跟橘子比,要是单纯比较重量跟尺寸,你说pickup跟sedan的重量尺寸怎么比?
    • 万一 重车,大车撞上了重车,大车会发生什么情况? 撞车也能 挑挑捡捡的吗?